Free energy devices, also known as ‘green energy’ or ‘energy storage’ devices, allow humans and other animals to consume a large amount of oxygen and water for energy.
The word is derived from the Greek words ‘bête’, meaning breath, and ‘enégas’, meaning oxygen.
The term was first used in the 1930s by the French physicist Maurice Merriam of the University of Paris in France, but it soon became the target of criticism from scientists who argued that the devices were a way of giving food, oxygen and moisture to humans. Scientists also thought it would cause an energy crisis.
The devices have existed since the early 1960s and are mainly created when a person’s body is on an elevated level of oxygen due to an injury or illness, or when the food supply is in short supply. Humans are usually connected to a device via a tube, known as an external oxygen tank, which is inserted into a hole on the back of the human.
The device allows the human to breathe oxygen and absorb the rest of the moisture in the air, which can be used as a fuel source for the next meal. It also helps the human to stay alive once this oxygen and food supply runs out.
Some of the devices are so sophisticated that they can hold gas in bottles filled with helium, providing a source of energy for vehicles to keep them running around town.
Some devices can store energy for up to 15 months.
This technology can be especially beneficial in the fight against climate change, which is due to a loss in the amount of oxygen needed for food production and for the human body – a decrease of about 18% since 1850 according to figures from the International Energy Agency.
However not all are on board with the new technology, which comes with concerns about safety and how it will affect a person’s energy levels.
The United Nations warned this week in a report that the global carbon dioxide emissions could increase by as much as 40% globally by 2039, and that the world is still producing enough carbon dioxide to warm the planet by 3.9 degrees Celsius by 2100.
If the world did not act, a warming of 4 or 5 degrees would be “likely” to be the result, the IPCC said.
In order to stay sustainable, emissions of carbon dioxide must be reduced.
Image copyright EPA/JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ Image caption The UK could see an impact from the carbon capture
free energy definition thermodynamics formulas physics, free energy generator homemade dc motor, new designs of free energy magnetic motors trick daddy, gibbs free energy of diamond to graphite, spontaneous gibbs free energy equation solving for variable